Rate effects on load-sharing and adhesion performance of bioinspired micropillar-arrayed surfaces

  • Yansong WANG ,
  • T. SHIMADA ,
  • Kaifa WANG ,
  • Baolin WANG
Expand
  • 1.School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong Province, China
    2.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan
Kaifa WANG, E-mail: wangkf@hit.edu.cn

Received date: 2026-02-04

  Revised date: 2026-03-16

  Online published: 2026-05-06

Supported by

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12372147), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of China (No. 2024A1515240026), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program of China (No. JCYJ20250604145418025), and China Scholarship Council (No. 202506120230)

Copyright

© Shanghai University 2026

Abstract

Bioinspired micropillar-arrayed surfaces have been widely adopted across diverse applications because they enable tunable adhesion enhancement. Although prior studies have examined their load-sharing efficiency and adhesion enhancement, the rate-dependent effects remain largely unexplored. Here, we investigate the rate dependence of the load-sharing efficiency and adhesion enhancement by extending an elastic array model to the viscoelastic case through the Lee-Radok correspondence principle. Our results show a pronounced drop in the load-sharing efficiency at intermediate loading rates, which can be attributed to a reduced effective stiffness ratio between the backing layer and the micropillars, leading to a larger count of deformation accommodated by the backing layer. The extent of the intermediate-rate reduction scales positively with the array size, and decreases with the increasing pillar spacing and pillar length. In terms of adhesion performance, the array designs that enhance adhesion relative to a smooth interface in the static limit do not necessarily retain this advantage once the rate effects are considered. This degradation is particularly pronounced for the dense arrays of slender micropillars, for which the maximum pull-off force ratio relative to a smooth surface can drop much more markedly than in the quasi-static case, thereby necessitating careful evaluation. The findings provide guidance for the design and reliability assessment of bioinspired micropillar interfaces under rate-dependent loading conditions.

Cite this article

Yansong WANG , T. SHIMADA , Kaifa WANG , Baolin WANG . Rate effects on load-sharing and adhesion performance of bioinspired micropillar-arrayed surfaces[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026 , 47(5) : 985 -1000 . DOI: 10.1007/s10483-026-3383-9

References

[1] AUTUMN, K., LIANG, Y. A., HSIEH, S. T., ZESCH, W., CHAN, W. P., KENNY, T. W., FEARING, R., and FULL, R. J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 405(6787), 681–685 (2000)
[2] AUTUMN, K., SITTI, M., LIANG, Y. A., PEATTIE, A. M., HANSEN, W. R., SPONBERG, S., KENNY, T. W., FEARING, R., ISRAELACHVILI, J. N., and FULL, R. J. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(19), 12252–12256 (2002)
[3] ZHAO, J. S., XIA, N., and ZHANG, L. A review of bioinspired dry adhesives: from achieving strong adhesion to realizing switchable adhesion. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 19(5), 051003 (2024)
[4] KIM, S., SPENKO, M., TRUJILLO, S., HEYNEMAN, B., SANTOS, D., and CUTKOSKY, M. R. Smooth vertical surface climbing with directional adhesion. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(1), 65–74 (2008)
[5] JIANG, H., HAWKES, E. W., FULLER, C., ESTRADA, M. A., SURESH, S. A., ABCOUWER, N., HAN, A. K., WANG, S. Q., PLOCH, C. J., PARNESS, A., and CUTKOSKY, M. R. A robotic device using gecko-inspired adhesives can grasp and manipulate large objects in microgravity. Science Robotics, 2(7), eaan4545 (2017)
[6] BAE, W. G., KIM, D., KWAK, M. K., HA, L., KANG, S. M., and SUH, K. Y. Enhanced skin adhesive patch with modulus-tunable composite micropillars. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2(1), 109–113 (2013)
[7] YANG, Y. H., XU, T. P., BEI, H. P., ZHAO, Y. J., and ZHAO, X. Sculpting bio-inspired surface textures: an adhesive Janus periosteum. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(37), 2104636 (2021)
[8] MOREIRA LANA, G., ZHANG, X., MüLLER, C., HENSEL, R., and ARZT, E. Film-terminated fibrillar microstructures with improved adhesion on skin-like surfaces. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(41), 46239–46251 (2022)
[9] TIAN, Q., ZHAO, H., WANG, X., JIANG, Y., ZHU, M. X., YELEMULATI, H., XIE, R. J., LI, Q. S., SU, R., CAO, Z. S., JIANG, N. F., HUANG, J. P., LI, G. L., CHEN, S. X., CHEN, X. D., and LIU, Z. Y. Hairy-skin-adaptive viscoelastic dry electrodes for long-term electrophysiological monitoring. Advanced Materials, 35(30), 2211236 (2023)
[10] ZHAO, K., ZHAO, Y. B., QIAN, R., and YE, C. Q. Recent progress on tattoo-like electronics: from materials and structural designs to versatile applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 477, 147109 (2023)
[11] JI, R. G., YUAN, Y. Y., LIU, X. F., ZHANG, X. L., and CAI, G. P. Modeling the pull-off force of a mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive in dynamic detachment. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 308, 113150 (2025)
[12] ZHOU, L., ZHANG, Y. Q., DENG, X. L., and LIU, M. B. Dissipative particle dynamics simulation of flow through periodic arrays of circular micropillar. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 37(11), 1431–1440 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-016-2091-9
[13] KHADERI, S. N., FLECK, N. A., ARZT, E., and MCMEEKING, R. M. Detachment of an adhered micropillar from a dissimilar substrate. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 75, 159–183 (2015)
[14] KUMAR, N. and KHADERI, S. N. The detachment of an inclined micro-pillar adhered to a dissimilar substrate. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 88(10), 101010 (2021)
[15] FLECK, N. A., KHADERI, S. N., MCMEEKING, R. M., and ARZT, E. Cohesive detachment of an elastic pillar from a dissimilar substrate. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 101, 30–43 (2017)
[16] TARPEY, R. and RONAN, W. The influence of substrate stiffness on interfacial stresses for adhesive microfibrils. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 172, 105175 (2023)
[17] PANDE, S. S. and TURNER, K. T. Geometric optimization of pillars for enhanced adhesion. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 59, 101969 (2023)
[18] NODERER, W. L., SHEN, L., VAJPAYEE, S., GLASSMAKER, N. J., JAGOTA, A., and HUI, C. Y. Enhanced adhesion and compliance of film-terminated fibrillar surfaces. Proceedings: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 463(2086), 2631–2654 (2007)
[19] GUIDONI, G. M., SCHILLO, D., HANGEN, U., CASTELLANOS, G., ARZT, E., MCMEEKING, R. M., and BENNEWITZ, R. Discrete contact mechanics of a fibrillar surface with backing layer interactions. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 58(10), 1571–1581 (2010)
[20] BACCA, M., BOOTH, J. A., TURNER, K. L., and MCMEEKING, R. M. Load sharing in bioinspired fibrillar adhesives with backing layer interactions and interfacial misalignment. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 96, 428–444 (2016)
[21] ZHANG, Y. C. and HE, L. H. Preload-responsive adhesion of microfibre arrays to rough surfaces. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 38(2), 155–160 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-017-2165-9
[22] BETTSCHEIDER, S., YU, D., FOSTER, K. L., MCMEEKING, R. M., ARZT, E., HENSEL, R., and BOOTH, J. A. Breakdown of continuum models for spherical probe adhesion tests on micropatterned surfaces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 150, 104365 (2021)
[23] AGOSTINELLI, D., MOHAMMAD, S., and BACCA, M. Adhesive strength of bio-inspired fibrillar arrays in the presence of contact defects. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 93(3), 031004 (2026)
[24] SHOJAEIFARD, M. and BACCA, M. Machine learning-based optimal design of fibrillar adhesives. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 22(223), 20240636 (2025)
[25] CHENG, Y. G., PENG, Z. L., and CHEN, S. H. A theoretical model of enhanced adhesion of bioinspired micropillar arrayed surfaces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 186, 105592 (2024)
[26] CHENG, Y. G., PENG, Z. L., and CHEN, S. H. The influence of backing layer thickness on the adhesion and detachment behavior of micropillar-arrayed surfaces. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 93(2), 021009 (2026)
[27] PERESSADKO, A. and GORB, S. N. When less is more: experimental evidence for tenacity enhancement by division of contact area. The Journal of Adhesion, 80(4), 247–261 (2004)
[28] GREINER, C., DEL CAMPO, A., and ARZT, E. Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload. Langmuir, 23(7), 3495–3502 (2007)
[29] SPUSKANYUK, A. V., MCMEEKING, R. M., DESHPANDE, V. S., and ARZT, E. The effect of shape on the adhesion of fibrillar surfaces. Acta Biomaterialia, 4(6), 1669–1676 (2008)
[30] LABONTE, D. and FEDERLE, W. Rate-dependence of ‘wet’ biological adhesives and the function of the pad secretion in insects. Soft Matter, 11(44), 8661–8673 (2015)
[31] LI, M., MAO, A. R., GUAN, Q. W., and SAIZ, E. Nature-inspired adhesive systems. Chemical Society Reviews, 53(16), 8240–8305 (2024)
[32] LI, R. Z., LI, D. W., LI, W. B., LIU, F. R., ZHANG, X. L., SUN, J., DENG, X. L., ZHAO, L. C., MENG, G., and ZHANG, W. M. Dynamic capture enabled by sequential phase-switching adhesion. Science Advances, 11(40), eadz7566 (2025)
[33] TOUZALINE, A. Analysis of a quasistatic contact problem with adhesion and nonlocal friction for viscoelastic materials. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 31(5), 623–634 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-010-0510-z
[34] YIN, H. B., MA, Y. J., and FENG, X. Rate-dependent peeling behavior of the viscoelastic film-substrate system. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 286-287, 112588 (2024)
[35] MANDRIOTA, C., MENGA, N., and CARBONE, G. Adhesive contact mechanics of viscoelastic materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 290, 112685 (2024)
[36] TRICARICO, M., CIAVARELLA, M., and PAPANGELO, A. Enhancement of adhesion strength through microvibrations: modeling and experiments. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 196, 106020 (2025)
[37] LI, R. Z., LI, D. W., and ZHANG, W. M. Rate effects in detachment of a spherical probe from fibrillar adhesive surfaces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 171, 105130 (2023)
[38] LIANG, X. M., WANG, G. F., and CIAVARELLA, M. Simple models of viscoelastic fibrillar adhesion to a rigid sphere. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 77, 102316 (2025)
[39] LIANG, X. M., WANG, G. F., and CIAVARELLA, M. Simple models of viscoelastic fibrillar adhesion between rigid rough surfaces. Mechanics of Materials, 214, 105582 (2026)
[40] ARGATOV, I. Nonlinear elastic metafoundation as a model for adhesive micropatterned elastic interfaces. International Journal of Engineering Science, 208, 104211 (2025)
[41] ARGATOV, I. and PAPANGELO, A. Adhesive contact of a viscoelastic fibrillar surface: a homogenized model. Mechanics Research Communications, 149, 104535 (2025)
[42] LEE, E. H. and RADOK, J. R. M. The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 27(3), 438–444 (1960)
[43] JOHNSON, K. L. Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
[44] SCHAPERY, R. A. A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media. International Journal of Fracture, 11(1), 141–159 (1975)
[45] GAO, H. J., WANG, X., YAO, H. M., GORB, S., and ARZT, E. Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mechanics of Materials, 37(2-3), 275–285 (2005)
Outlines

/

APS Journals | CSTAM Journals | AMS Journals | EMS Journals | ASME Journals