Appl. Math. Mech. -Engl. Ed.   2017, Vol. 38 Issue (6): 877-888     PDF       
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10483-017-2201-7
Shanghai University
0

Article Information

Yongan ZHU, Fan WANG, Renhuai LIU
Nonlinear stability of sensor elastic element—corrugated shallow spherical shell in coupled multi-field
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 2017, 38(6): 877-888.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10483-017-2201-7

Article History

Received Jul. 1, 2016
Revised Sep. 25, 2016
Nonlinear stability of sensor elastic element—corrugated shallow spherical shell in coupled multi-field
Yongan ZHU1, Fan WANG1, Renhuai LIU1,2     
1. Institute of Applied Mechanics, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Forecast and Control in Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Abstract: Nonlinear stability of sensor elastic element—corrugated shallow spherical shell in coupled multi-field is studied. With the equivalent orthotropic parameter obtained by the author, the corrugated shallow spherical shell is considered as an orthotropic shallow spherical shell, and geometrical nonlinearity and transverse shear deformation are taken into account. Nonlinear governing equations are obtained. The critical load is obtained using a modified iteration method. The effect of temperature variation and shear rigidity variation on stability is analyzed.
Key words: modified iteration method     corrugated shallow spherical shell     multi-field     stability     critical load     temperature variation    
1 Introduction

Sensor is the basic element and the information source of internet of things, which is widely used in many fields, such as industrial production, environment protection, medical diagnosis, and bioengineering. As the basic element of the internet of things, it is very important that whether the sensor can gather the signal correctly in the information collection system. The corrugated shallow spherical shell is an important kind of sensor elastic element. Because of the particular metal texture, it can work in high temperature field. The stability problem of corrugated shallow spherical shell in load and temperature field is very important. The sensor component includes corrugated circular plate, corrugated shell, and corrugated pipe. Feodosev[1], Andryewa[2-3], Akasaka[4], and Liu et al.[5-7] have investigated the nonlinear problem about corrugated plate. Salashiling[8] discussed nonlinear bending of cylindrical corrugated shell by using equal orthotropic elastic parameter which is provided by Andryewa[2]. Wang and Liu[9-11] developed equivalent orthotropic parameter of corrugated shallow spherical shell, and discussed nonlinear dynamic buckling of corrugated shallow spherical shell. Yuan[12-13] discussed nonlinear vibration of corrugated shell by applying Green's function method. Xia et al.[14] discussed equivalent model of corrugated panel. Winkler and Kress[15] discussed deformation of corrugated cross-ply laminates. In this paper, nonlinear stability of corrugated shallow spherical shell in coupled multi-field is studied. With the equivalent orthotropic parameter obtained by the author[9], the corrugated shallow spherical shell is considered as an orthotropic shallow spherical shell, and the effect of transverse shear deformation is taken into account. The nonlinear governing equations are obtained. The critical load is obtained using a modified iteration method. The effect of temperature variation and shear rigidity variation on critical load is analyzed.

2 Fundamental equations

A corrugated shallow spherical shell as shown in Fig. 1 is considered with thickness h, radius a, radius of curvature R, amplitude H, wavelength l, and center height f under a uniform pressure q and a uniform temperature field T, which can be equal to an orthotropic shallow spherical shell as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1 Corrugated shallow spherical shell
Fig. 2 Orthotropic shallow spherical shell

It can be concluded from the axisymmetric condition that the radical, circumferential, and axial displacements of an arbitrary point at a distance z from the middle surface of the shallow spherical shell, which can be written as follows[13]:

(1)

where u0 and w0 are the radical displacement and the deflection of a point on the middle surface respectively, and γrz0 is the transverse shear strain of the point.

The geometrical equations are shown as follows:

(2)

By substituting (1) into (2), the results are obtained as follows:

(3)

where εr0 and ε θ0 are the radial and circumferential strains of middle surface respectively, and κr and κθ are the radial and circumferential curvatures of middle surface respectively.

(4)

According to Andryewa's method[3], εr and εθ can be expressed as follows:

(5)

where εr1 and εθ1 are the radial and circumferential strains caused by stretching, and εr2 and εθ2 are the radial and circumferential strains caused by bending:

(6)

Because of the dual orthotropic character of the shallow spherical shell, the relation between strain and stress can be shown as follows[13]:

For the stretching part:

(7)

For the bending part:

(8)

where σr1 and σθ 1 are the radial and circumferential stress caused by stretching, σr2 and σθ 2 are the radial and circumferential stress caused by bending, Er1 and Eθ1 are the elastic moduli of the shell material when the shell bears stretching, and Er2 and Eθ1 are the elastic moduli of the shell material when the shell bears bending. υθr1 and υθr2 are the Poisson's ratios in the r-direction during tension applied in the θ-direction, and υ 1 and υ2 are the Poisson's ratios in the θ-direction during tension applied in the r-direction.

(9)

and

(10)

where υ is Poisson's ratio of the corrugated shell's material.

The equivalent cylindrically orthotropic shallow spherical shell's elastic moduli can be shown as follows:

(11)

where E is the elastic modulus of the corrugated shell's material, and κr1, κθ 1, κr2, and κθ 2 are the equivalent orthotropic parameters about the radical and circumferential rigidity.

According to (6), (7), (8), (9), and (11), the constitutive equations are obtained as follows:

(12)

where

The equivalent shell's transverse shear stress can be determined as follows:

(13)

where Grz is the shear modulus which determines angle change between the directions of r and z.

By substituting (3) into (13), the expression of τ rz can be expressed as follows:

(14)

According to Salashiling's method[8], the expression of Grz can be shown as follows:

(15)

where G is the material’s shear modulus.

Figure 3 shows the shell element which is cut out by two meridians and two parallel circles. Here, Nr and Nθ are the radial and circumferential membrane forces respectively, Mr and Mθ are the radial and circumferential moments respectively, and Qr is the radial shear force. The expressions are shown as follows:

(16)
Fig. 3 Stress resultants on shell element

By substituting (12) and (14) into (16), the results are shown as follows:

(17)

where Aij and Dij are the stretching rigidity and bending rigidity respectively, G0 is the shear rigidity, Qij' and Qij" are same as those in Ref. [7], and αr and αθ are the radical and circumferential thermal expanding coefficients of the shell.

The equilibrium equations of the shell element can be shown as follows:

(18)
3 Governing equations

The governing equations[13] can be obtained as follows according to (16), (17), and (18) :

(19)
(20)
(21)

where

(22)

(19) -(21) can be solved under the edge rigidly clamped boundary conditions:

(23)
(24)

In order to simplify the following calculations, the following dimensionless notations are introduced:

in which λ is the dimensionless thermal membrane force.

With the help of these notations, the nonlinear boundary value problem (19) -(24) may be rewritten in a more convenient dimensionless form:

(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
4 Analytical solution

The modified iteration method is used to solve the dimensionless nonlinear boundary value problem (25) -(29). The notation Wm is chosen for the dimensionless center deflection as an iteration parameter.

(30)

For the first approximation, by neglecting the nonlinear term sΦ in (25), the following linear boundary value problem is obtained:

(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)

By solving (31) -(35) and using (30), the following solutions for the first approximation are obtained:

in which f1 (ρ), f2 (ρ), and f3 (ρ) are the multinomial expressions, which are detailed in Appendix A.

For the second approximation, the following nonlinear boundary value problem is obtained:

(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)

By solving (36) to (39), the solution for the second approximation is obtained:

in which f4 (ρ) to f9 (ρ) are the multinomial expressions, which are detailed in Appendix A.

By using (30), the nonlinear characteristic relation of the corrugated shallow spherical shell is obtained as follows:

(40)

where ei (i=1, 2, …, 6) are the coefficients of multinomial expressions, which are detailed in Appendix A.

In order to find the critical buckling pressure P* of the shell, the following condition is applied:

(41)

The dimensionless critical center deflection of the shell when buckling occurs is obtained as follows:

(42)

By substituting (42) into (40), the dimensionless critical buckling pressure is obtained:

(43)
5 Numerical example

As a numerical example, a corrugated shallow spherical shell with a=80 mm, l=12 mm, H=1.35 mm, h=0.4 mm, and R=200 mm is considered. According to (40) -(43), the numerical results are shown in the following figures (see Figs. 4-7).

Fig. 4 Curves of load versus deflection (λ =0)
Fig. 5 Effect of thermal membrane force on upper critical load
Fig. 6 Effect of thermal membrane critical force on lower critical load
Fig. 7 Effect of shear rigidity on critical load (λ =0)

(i) Curves of load versus deflection are shown in Fig. 4. There are two critical points in the figure which represent two critical loads: upper critical load and lower critical load. For example, if the shear rigidity parameter is 1, the upper critical load is 2.392 8 × 104, and the lower critical load is -6.332 2× 10 4; if the shear rigidity parameter is 41, the upper critical load is 3.077 8 × 104, and the lower critical load is -5.143 5 × 104.

(ⅱ) Curves of upper critical load versus thermal membrane force are shown in Fig.5, it can be found that P* increases as λ increases. If the shear rigidity parameter is 41, the upper critical load increases from 3.077 8× 104 to 3.081 × 104 when the thermal membrane force increases from 0 to 10.

(ⅲ) Curves of lower critical load versus thermal membrane force are shown in Fig.6, it can be found that P* decreases as λ increases. If the shear rigidity parameter is 41, the lower critical load decreases from -5.143 5× 104 to -5.148 0× 104 when the thermal membrane force increases from 0 to 10.

(ⅳ) Curves of critical load versus shear rigidity are shown in Fig. 7. The critical load P* increases as the shear rigidity m increases.

6 Conclusions

From the computation and the analysis of the numerical results obtained, the following conclusions can be drawn.

(Ⅰ) The critical load P* increases as the rigidity m increases.

(Ⅱ) For the designing of engineering structure, the upper critical load is usually taken into account because of the designing value. The upper critical load P* increases as the thermal membrane force λ increases. In other words, if temperature increases, the shell's stability will be increased.

(Ⅲ) Buckling does not occur on the shell if the shear rigidity is large enough.

(Ⅳ) The result of this paper is the result of thermal stability problem of corrugated shallow spherical shell in coupled multi-field--uniform temperature field and uniform pressure. If there is no temperature field (λ =0), the result reduces to the nonlinear stability problem of corrugated shallow spherical shell under uniform pressure.

Appendix A
References
[1] Feodosev, V. I. Elastic Elements of Precision-Instruments Manufacture (in Russian). Oborongiz, Moscow, 186-206 (1949)
[2] Andryewa, L. E. The calculation of a corrugated membrane as an anisotropic plate (in Russian). Engineer's Collection, 21, 128-141 (1955)
[3] Andryewa, L. E. Elastic Elements of Instruments (in Russian). Masgiz, Moscow (1981)
[4] Akasaka, T. On the elastic properties of the corrugated diaphragm. Journal of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 3, 279-288 (1955)
[5] Liu, R. H. Large deflection of corrugated circular plate under the action of concentrated loads at the center. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 19, 409-419 (1984) doi:10.1016/0020-7462(84)90027-1
[6] Liu, R. H. and Li, D. On nonlinear bending and vibration of corrugated circular plate. Interna-tional Jouranl of Non-Linear Mechanics, 24, 165-176 (1989) doi:10.1016/0020-7462(89)90035-8
[7] Liu, R. H. and Zou, R. P. Non-linear bending of a corrugated annular plate with a plane boundary region and a non-deformable rigid body at the center under compound loa. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 28, 353-364 (1993) doi:10.1016/0020-7462(93)90041-I
[8] Salashiling, V. I. The calculation of a cylindrical corrugated shell. The Collection of Construction Frame (in Russian), Steroigiz, Moscow, 339-345 (1965)
[9] Wang, F. and Liu, R.H. Orthotropic parameters of corrugated shallow spherical shells (in Chi-nese). Journal of Jinan University, 24, 10-15 (2003)
[10] Wang, F. and Liu, R. H. Nonlinear dynamic buckling of corrugated shallow spherical shell. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 18, 426-432 (2005)
[11] Liu, R. H. and Wang, F. Nonlinear stability of corrugated shallow spherical shell. International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 10, 295-309 (2005)
[12] Yuan, H. Nonlinear vibration of corrugated shells under uniform load. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 28, 573-580 (2007) doi:10.1007/s10483-007-0502-1
[13] Yuan, H. Method of Green's function of corrugated shells. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 26, 830-837 (2005) doi:10.1007/BF02464231
[14] Xia, Y., Friswelll, M. I., and Saavedra Flores, E. I. Equivalent models of corrugated panels. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 49, 1453-1462 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.023
[15] Winkler, M. and Kress, G. Deformation limits for corrugated cross ply laminates. Composite Structures, 92, 1458-1468 (2010) doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.015