Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition) ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 183-196 .

• Articles • 上一篇    下一篇

Explicit formulations and performance of LSFD method on Cartesian mesh

蔡庆东   

  1. LTCS and CAPT, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
  • 收稿日期:2008-06-05 修回日期:2008-11-12 出版日期:2009-02-11 发布日期:2009-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 蔡庆东

Explicit formulations and performance of LSFD method on Cartesian mesh

Qing-dong CAI   

  1. LTCS and CAPT, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
  • Received:2008-06-05 Revised:2008-11-12 Online:2009-02-11 Published:2009-02-11
  • Contact: Qing-dong CAI

摘要: Performance of the LSFD method is compared with conventional FD schemes. Generally, 9-point stencils for 2D cases and 27-point stencils for 3D cases are used for the approximation of the first and second order derivatives obtained with conventional central difference schemes. When the same stencils are used, explicit LSFD formulations for approximation of the first and second order derivatives are presented. The LSFD formulations are actually a combination of conventional central difference schemes along relevant mesh lines. It has been found that LSFD formulations need much less iteration steps than the conventional FD schemes to converge, and the ratio of mesh spacing in the x and y directions is an important parameter in the LSFD application, with a great impact on stability of LSFD computation.

Abstract: Performance of the LSFD method is compared with conventional FD schemes. Generally, 9-point stencils for 2D cases and 27-point stencils for 3D cases are used for the approximation of the first and second order derivatives obtained with conventional central difference schemes. When the same stencils are used, explicit LSFD formulations for approximation of the first and second order derivatives are presented. The LSFD formulations are actually a combination of conventional central difference schemes along relevant mesh lines. It has been found that LSFD formulations need much less iteration steps than the conventional FD schemes to converge, and the ratio of mesh spacing in the x and y directions is an important parameter in the LSFD application, with a great impact on stability of LSFD computation.

Key words: LSFD method, meshfree method, Cartesian mesh, aspect ratio

APS Journals | CSTAM Journals | AMS Journals | EMS Journals | ASME Journals