Applied Mathematics and Mechanics >
Fluid-structure interaction simulation of three-dimensional flexible hydrofoil in water tunnel
Received date: 2015-03-08
Revised date: 2015-05-15
Online published: 2016-01-01
Supported by
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10832007) and the Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (No. B206)
The closely coupled approach combined with the finite volume method (FVM) solver and the finite element method (FEM) solver is used to investigate the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) of a three-dimensional cantilevered hydrofoil in the water tunnel. The FVM solver and the coupled approach are verified and validated by comparing the numerical predictions with the experimental measurements, and good agreement is obtained concerning both the lift on the foil and the tip displacement. In the noncavitating flow, the result indicates that the growth of the initial incidence angle and the Reynolds number improves the deformation of the foil, and the lift on the foil is increased by the twist deformation. The normalized twist angle and displacement along the span of the hydrofoil for different incidence angles and Reynolds numbers are almost uniform. For the cavitation flow, it is shown that the small amplitude vibration of the foil has limited influence on the developing process of the partial cavity, and the quasi two-dimensional cavity shedding does not change the deformation mode of the hydrofoil. However, the frequency spectrum of the lift on the foil contains the frequency which is associated with the first bend frequency of the hydrofoil.
Shiliang HU, Chuanjing LU, Yousheng HE . Fluid-structure interaction simulation of three-dimensional flexible hydrofoil in water tunnel[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2016 , 37(1) : 15 -26 . DOI: 10.1007/s10483-016-2011-9
[1] Dowell, E. H. Panel flutter-a review of the aeroelastic stability of plates and shells. AIAA Journal, 8(3), 385-399(1970)
[2] Xiang, J., Yan, Y., and Li, D. Recent advance in nonlinear aeroelastic analysis and control of the aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 27(1), 12-22(2014)
[3] Amromin, E. and Kovinskaya, S. Vibration of cavitating elastic wing in a periodically perturbed flow:excitation of subharmonics. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 14(5), 735-751(2000)
[4] Zhang, L., Guo, Y., and Wang, W. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a true 3D Francis hydro turbine passage with dynamical fluid-structure interaction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 54(5), 517-541(2007)
[5] Campbell, R. L. and Paterson, E. G. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flexible turbomachinery. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 27(8), 1376-1391(2011)
[6] De la Torre, O., Escaler, X., Egusquiza, E., and Farhat, M. Experimental investigation of added mass effects on a hydrofoil under cavitation conditions. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 39, 173-187(2013)
[7] Young, Y. L. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flexible composite marine propellers. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 24(6), 799-818(2008)
[8] Ducoin, A., André-Astolfi, J., and Sigrist, J. F. An experimental analysis of fluid structure interaction on a flexible hydrofoil in various flow regimes including cavitating flow. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 36, 63-74(2012)
[9] Lian, Y., Shyy, W., Ifju, P., and Verron, E. A computational model for coupled membrane-fluid dynamics. AIAA Paper, 2972, 2492-2494(2002)
[10] Orszag, S. A., Yakhot, V., Flannery, W. S., Boysan, F., Choudhury, D., Maruzewski, J., and Patel, B. Renormalization group modeling and turbulence simulations. International Conference on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1031-1046(1993)
[11] Coutier-Delgosha, O., Fortes-Patella, R., and Reboud, J. L. Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 125(1), 38-45(2003)
[12] Zwart, P. J., Gerber, A. G., and Belamri, T. A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics. The Fifth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama, Japan (2004)
[13] Morgut, M., Nobile, E., and Biluš, I. Comparison of mass transfer models for the numerical prediction of sheet cavitation around a hydrofoil. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 37(6), 620-626(2011)
[14] Jansen, K. E., Shakib, F., and Hughes, T. J. Fast projection algorithm for unstructured meshes. Computational Nonlinear Mechanics in Aerospace Engineering, A93, 175-204(1992)
[15] Leroux, J. B., Astolfi, J. A., and Billard, J. Y. An experimental study of unsteady partial cavitation. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 126(1), 94-101(2004)
[16] Ducoin, A. and Young, Y. L. Hydroelastic response and stability of a hydrofoil in viscous flow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 38, 40-57(2013)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
Email Alert
RSS