Articles

Numerical investigation of dynamical behavior of tethered rigid spheres in supersonic flow

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis of Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China;
    2. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China

Received date: 2016-01-14

  Revised date: 2016-01-16

  Online published: 2016-06-01

Supported by

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11372068) and the National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2014CB-744104)

Abstract

The dynamical behavior of two tethered rigid spheres in a supersonic flow is numerically investigated. The tethered lengths and radius ratios of the two spheres are different. The two spheres, which are centroid axially aligned initially, are held stationary first, then released, and subsequently let fly freely in a supersonic flow. The mean qualities of the system and the qualities of the bigger sphere are considered and compared with the situations without the tether. In the separation process, six types of motion caused by the spheres, tether, and fluid interaction are found. The results show that the mean x-velocity of the system changes in a different manner for different radius ratios, and the x-velocity of the bigger sphere is uniformly reduced but through different mechanisms.

Cite this article

Tao LI, Jingxia SUI, Chuijie WU . Numerical investigation of dynamical behavior of tethered rigid spheres in supersonic flow[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2016 , 37(6) : 749 -760 . DOI: 10.1007/s10483-016-2090-6

References

[1] Chen, Y., Huang, R., Ren, X., He, L., and He, Y. History of the tether concept and tether missions: a review. ISRN Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2013, 502973 (2013)
[2] Kornuta, J. A. and Guo, S. Momentum exchange tether as a hypersonic parachute during reentry for human missions. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 47, 571-579 (2010)
[3] Laurence, S. J. and Deiterding, R. Shock-wave surfing. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 676, 396-431 (2011)
[4] Laurence, S. J., Parziale, N. J., and Deiterding, R. Dynamical separation of spherical bodies in supersonic flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 713, 159-182 (2012)
[5] Li, T., Sui, J. X., Gong, S., and Wu, C. J. Dynamical separation of rigid bodies in supersonic flow. Science China: Technological Sciences, 58, 1-12 (2015)
[6] Hoerner, S. Fluid Dynamic Drag: Practical Information on Aerodynamic Drag and Hydrodynamic Resistance, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, Bakersfield (1965)
[7] KosoviÇ, B., Pullin, D. I., and Samtaney, R. Subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulations of compressible turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 14, 1511-1522 (2002)
[8] Misra, A. and Pullin, D. I. A vortex-based subgrid stress model for large-eddy simulation. Physics of Fluids, 9, 2443-2454 (1997)
[9] Pullin, D. I. A vortex-based model for the subgrid flux of a passive scalar. Physics of Fluids, 12, 2311-2319 (2000)
[10] Steger, J. L. and Warming, R. Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite-difference methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 40, 263-293 (1981)
[11] Liu, X. D., Osher, S., and Chan, T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 115, 200-212 (1994)
[12] Fedkiw, R. P., Aslam, T., Merriman, B., and Osher, S. A non-oscillatory eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows (the ghost fluid method). Journal of Computational Physics, 152, 457-492 (1999)
[13] Wu, K., Hao, L., Wang, C., and Zhang, L. Level set interface treatment and its application in Euler method. Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 53, 227-236 (2010)
[14] Mittal, R., Dong, H., Bozkurttas, M., Najjar, F., Vargas, A., and von Loebbecke, A. A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 227, 4825-4852 (2008)
[15] Deiterding, R. Detonation structure simulation with amroc. High Performance Computing and Communications, Springer, Heidelberg, 916-927 (2005)
[16] Lee, X. and Lee, C. An implicit algorithm based on iterative modified approximate factoriza-tion method coupling with characteristic boundary conditions for solving subsonic viscous flows. Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 56, 1187-1208 (2013)
[17] Bai, Y., Yang, K., Sun, D., Zhang, Y., Kennedy, D., Williams, F., and Gao, X. Numerical aerodynamic analysis of bluff bodies at a high reynolds number with three-dimensional CFD modelling. Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 56, 277-289 (2013)
[18] Borazjani, I., Ge, L., and Sotiropoulos, F. Curvilinear immersed boundary method for simulating fluid structure interaction with complex 3D rigid bodies. Journal of Computational Physics, 227, 7587-7620 (2008)
[19] Conca, C., Osses, A., and Planchard, J. Added mass and damping in fluid-structure interaction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 146, 387-405 (1997)

Outlines

/

APS Journals | CSTAM Journals | AMS Journals | EMS Journals | ASME Journals